CC1100/CC2500

From TinyOS Wiki
Revision as of 10:22, 17 January 2008 by Dmoss (talk | contribs) (Software)
Jump to: navigation, search

Comparison

Side-by-side Performance

CC2420 vs. CC1100 vs. CC2500
CC1100 CC2500 CC2420
Throughput 1.2-500 kbps 1.2-500 kbps 250 kbps
Frequencies 315/433/915 MHz 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Rx Current 14 mA 12.8 mA 19.7 mA
Tx Current 15 mA 21.6 mA 17.4 mA
Output Power +10 dBm +1 dBm +0 dBm
Receiver Sensitivity -111 dBm -104 dBm -95 dBm
Modulation 2-FSK/GFSK/MSK/OOK/ASK 2-FSK/GFSK/MSK/OOK/ASK DSSS
Packaging 20QFN 4×4 mm 20QFN 4×4 mm QLP-48 7×7 mm
Encryption None None AES-128
Current Low Power Implementations WoR/B-MAC WoR/B-MAC BoX-MAC-2

Trades

Drivers

The CC1100/CC1101/CC2500 radios are pin and driver compatible. Dual-radio platforms are easily achievable.

Range vs. Frequency

The lower the frequency, the longer the range. The CC1100 sports the lowest frequency.

Frequency vs. Antenna Size

The lower the frequency, the larger the antenna. The 2.4 GHz radios, CC2500 and CC2420, require the smallest antenna.

Throughput vs. Current Consumption

The higher the throughput, the less energy it takes to transmit the data. In terms of raw throughput, the CC1100 and CC2500 can be more energy efficient than the fixed-rate throughput of the CC2420. However, at a lower throughputs, the maximum current consumption decreases. Although the maximum current consumption decreases (helping you match to a particular battery better), the total energy consumption increases because it takes longer to send the same amount of data.

Throughput vs. Range

The CC1100 and CC2500 can decrease their throughput to achieve longer range. With the CC1100 radio at 315 MHz, for example, we've achieved a maximum of ~700-800 feet transmission range on the ground.

Accessories

  • The CC2420 includes hardware AES-128 encryption.
  • The CC1100 and CC2500 include hardware Wake-on-Radio (low power listening) functionality.