Difference between revisions of "CC1100/CC2500"
(→Side-by-side Performance) |
(→Side-by-side Performance) |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Experimental Range ''on the ground'' | ! Experimental Range ''on the ground'' | ||
− | | '''700-800 ft''' || unknown || 10-20 ft | + | | '''700-800 ft''' (315 MHz) || unknown || 10-20 ft |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 07:53, 22 January 2008
The CC1100/CC1101/CC2500 radios are transceivers designed for very low-power wireless applications. The CC1100/CC1101 radios can operate at frequency bands 315, 433, 868, and 915 MHz. The CC2500 radio operates at 2.4 GHz.
Dubbed project "Blaze" to encompass all of these radios types, this TinyOS development will continue pushing the boundaries of practical and efficient radio technology in wireless sensor networks.
Contents
Radio Software
Drivers for TinyOS are open-source and are located in the tinyos-2.x-contrib/blaze repository.
Radio Comparisons
Side-by-side Performance
CC1100 | CC2500 | CC2420 | |
---|---|---|---|
Throughput | 1.2-500 kbps | 1.2-500 kbps | 250 kbps |
Frequencies | 315/433/915 MHz | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Rx Current | 14 mA | 12.8 mA | 19.7 mA |
Tx Current | 15 mA | 21.6 mA | 17.4 mA |
Output Power | +10 dBm | +1 dBm | +0 dBm |
Receiver Sensitivity | -111 dBm | -104 dBm | -95 dBm |
Modulation | 2-FSK/GFSK/MSK/OOK/ASK | 2-FSK/GFSK/MSK/OOK/ASK | DSSS |
Packaging | 20QFN 4×4 mm | 20QFN 4×4 mm | QLP-48 7×7 mm |
Encryption | None | None | AES-128 |
Current Low Power Implementations | WoR/B-MAC | WoR/B-MAC | BoX-MAC-2 |
Experimental Range on the ground | 700-800 ft (315 MHz) | unknown | 10-20 ft |
Trades
Drivers
The CC1100/CC1101/CC2500 radios are pin and driver compatible. Dual-radio platforms are easily achievable.
Range vs. Frequency
The lower the frequency, the longer the range. The CC1100 sports the lowest frequency.
Frequency vs. Antenna Size
The lower the frequency, the larger the antenna. The 2.4 GHz radios, CC2500 and CC2420, require the smallest antenna.
Throughput vs. Current Consumption
The higher the throughput, the less energy it takes to transmit the data. In terms of raw throughput, the CC1100 and CC2500 can be more energy efficient than the fixed-rate throughput of the CC2420. However, at a lower throughputs, the maximum current consumption decreases. Although the maximum current consumption decreases (helping you match to a particular battery better), the total energy consumption increases because it takes longer to send the same amount of data.
Throughput vs. Range
The CC1100 and CC2500 can decrease their throughput to achieve longer range. With the CC1100 radio at 315 MHz, for example, we've achieved a maximum of ~700-800 feet transmission range on the ground.
Accessories
- The CC2420 includes hardware AES-128 encryption.
- The CC2420 radio is intended for 802.15.4 compatibility. You really have to ask yourself if that's worth it - the CCxx00 radio stack was designed to eliminate false acknowledgments.
- The CC1100 and CC2500 include hardware Wake-on-Radio (low power listening) functionality.
Platforms
- Tmote2500 wiring description - using a telosb/tmote + CC2500 or CC1100 eval module.